Skip to content

Reimplement Old Conjunction/Disjunction [Suggestion] #326

Description

@Robotgiggle

The old conjunction and disjunction patterns were very useful for dealing with operations that may or may not produce Null, such as raycasts. Now that they're gone, the amount of patterns necessary to null-proof a raycast has fully doubled. Also, as pointed out by DaComputerNerd on the discord, C# and many other languages include operators that work exactly like the old conjunction/disjunction showing just how useful those operations are.

The reimplementation could be as two completely new patterns, or possibly as an alternate functionality for the existing ones based on whether your provide bools or anything else as input.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Status
    📋 Backlog

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions