Basically what Mullvad app does for their "shadowsocks bridges" but allow the users to input their own address, auth params and encryption params (including "no encryption")
Also (or even alternatively) implement same but with SOCKS5 UDP
Usecase:
Route Wireguard Windscribe traffic over fancy obfuscating VPNs that have clients with shadowsocks and/or SOCKS5 UDP inbounds
For example, this would allow the following:
Run Karing in non-VPN mode and a shadowsocks or SOCKS5 UDP inbound
Add Karing to Windscribe VPN exemptions
Configure Windscribe to use the Karing inbound
Configure Karing with one of the fancy but very very shady services that offer modern VLESS (Rality-shmeality-xhttp-whatever) obfuscation
And now you have Windscribe with advanced obfuscation to bypass even very severe anti-VPN filtering and even if the service provider of the obfuscator is some kind of [expletive] that shares info with LEAs the most they end up learning is that you used windscribe as your "inner tunnel"
Would also simplify future extension of Windscribe block evasion abilities
P.S. SOCKS5 UDP would be preferred because it is more widespread but I hear routing wireguard over shadowsocks UDP is easier due to lack of whole additional TCP connection for control song-and-dance implied by SOCKS5 UDP
Basically what Mullvad app does for their "shadowsocks bridges" but allow the users to input their own address, auth params and encryption params (including "no encryption")
Also (or even alternatively) implement same but with SOCKS5 UDP
Usecase:
Route Wireguard Windscribe traffic over fancy obfuscating VPNs that have clients with shadowsocks and/or SOCKS5 UDP inbounds
For example, this would allow the following:
Run Karing in non-VPN mode and a shadowsocks or SOCKS5 UDP inbound
Add Karing to Windscribe VPN exemptions
Configure Windscribe to use the Karing inbound
Configure Karing with one of the fancy but very very shady services that offer modern VLESS (Rality-shmeality-xhttp-whatever) obfuscation
And now you have Windscribe with advanced obfuscation to bypass even very severe anti-VPN filtering and even if the service provider of the obfuscator is some kind of [expletive] that shares info with LEAs the most they end up learning is that you used windscribe as your "inner tunnel"
Would also simplify future extension of Windscribe block evasion abilities
P.S. SOCKS5 UDP would be preferred because it is more widespread but I hear routing wireguard over shadowsocks UDP is easier due to lack of whole additional TCP connection for control song-and-dance implied by SOCKS5 UDP