To protect against the big rise in dependency confusion and compromised packages, we have implemented an internal 'cargo proxy' to be able to add policies to reduce exposure.
Cargo commands used for communicating with crates.io allows you to provide proxy server configuration in the .cargo/config.toml file:
cat /Users/MyUser/.cargo/config.toml
[http]
proxy = "socks5h://192.168.1.1:6789"
[https]
proxy = "socks5h://192.168.1.1:6789"
Unfortunately, cargo upgrade doesn't respect the .cargo/config.toml configuration, neither does it seem to pick up on environment variables HTTP_PROXY/HTTPS_PROXY for communication.
Here's the output:
cargo upgrade --verbose
Checking virtual workspace's dependencies
Error: error sending request for url (https://index.crates.io/an/yh/anyhow)
Caused by:
0: client error (Connect)
1: Socket is not connected (os error 57)
Would it be possible to add proxy support to cargo-edit commands where applicable? In my opinion the best way would be through cargo's generic configuration, but environment variables would also be an acceptable workaround.
To protect against the big rise in dependency confusion and compromised packages, we have implemented an internal 'cargo proxy' to be able to add policies to reduce exposure.
Cargo commands used for communicating with crates.io allows you to provide proxy server configuration in the .cargo/config.toml file:
Unfortunately,
cargo upgradedoesn't respect the .cargo/config.toml configuration, neither does it seem to pick up on environment variablesHTTP_PROXY/HTTPS_PROXYfor communication.Here's the output:
cargo upgrade --verbose Checking virtual workspace's dependencies Error: error sending request for url (https://index.crates.io/an/yh/anyhow) Caused by: 0: client error (Connect) 1: Socket is not connected (os error 57)Would it be possible to add proxy support to cargo-edit commands where applicable? In my opinion the best way would be through cargo's generic configuration, but environment variables would also be an acceptable workaround.