Skip to content

fix(security): preserve tenant scope through service lookup - #380

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 3 commits into
fix/tenant-id-query-boundary-after-342-20260811from
fix/tenant-scoped-service-lookup-after-361-20260811
Draft

fix(security): preserve tenant scope through service lookup#380
seonghobae wants to merge 3 commits into
fix/tenant-id-query-boundary-after-342-20260811from
fix/tenant-scoped-service-lookup-after-361-20260811

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Objective

Advance tenant-safe job reads after #361 by carrying authenticated tenant authority through the application-service lookup boundary. The service must not globally retrieve a job and filter ownership afterward when the repository exposes a storage-scoped tenant/id query.

Test-first state

This Draft starts intentionally RED at exact test-only head aff4f013f60ea400818693f30d51ff92c227f344. TenantScopedConversionServiceLookupTest requires the service-interface default to fail closed without invoking global getJob(UUID), and requires DefaultDocumentConversionService to delegate directly to ConversionJobRepository.findByTenantAndId(...) while rejecting absent tenant/job authority. Production does not expose getJob(UUID, TenantContext) at this head, so test compilation is expected to fail at that exact boundary.

Stack and scope

Base is #361 branch fix/tenant-id-query-boundary-after-342-20260811 exact head 977492622bc1f26d09c3f5ebbb76461407063f8f, itself stacked on #342. This child adds only the application-service scoped lookup contract/implementation and focused tests. It does not modify controllers, admin deletion, artifact delivery, OIDC/credential work, durable persistence, or canonical docs.

Acceptance

Observe exact-head RED -> smallest service contract/implementation -> exact-head Maven/coverage/Javadoc and emitted CI evidence. Keep Draft while #361/#342 remain open; after ancestors integrate, reconcile this unique delta onto the live protected base and regenerate base-sensitive checks/reviews. Independent write-authorized approval remains a separate protected-merge gate.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f829b398-c5ee-4956-a72c-320d1c57eb68

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant