test(config): bind bootstrap API and public documentation - #207
Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
test(config): bind bootstrap API and public documentation#207seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Contributor
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This was referenced Aug 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
Close a path-disjoint quality/documentation gap on protected
develop@622e5e6c3d534f230c390f10e3832efadfc01825: Config Server is an independently runnable production module, but its publicConfigServerApplicationbootstrap class/method historically had no beginner-readable Javadoc and protected source had no application-bootstrap test.This Draft is deliberately narrower than active #189. #189 owns Config Server Git repository authority; #193 owns inbound Config Server client identity. This PR changes only the bootstrap application class/test. It does not change
CONFIG_REPO_URI, promote Config Server to the default supported topology, add credentials, change dependencies, or claim repository-wide coverage (#205).Exact current identity
develop@622e5e6c3d534f230c390f10e3832efadfc01825;quality/config-bootstrap-docs-tests-622e5e6;6c99beb84cdd91865e0a4102618ad0a49c2ddc32;0f4a836f012a6c695ead9e9d45911ff004edd918;1c707d679c4562adea2133cd46f913cddfdc34c1;ConfigServerApplication.javaandConfigServerApplicationContractTest.java;Every check/review from the RED head, predecessor source, or another base is historical and does not transfer.
RED → GREEN
The fail-first commit added
ConfigServerApplicationContractTestbefore production documentation changed. It preserves the real@SpringBootApplication/@EnableConfigServerbootstrap and public-staticmain(String[])entry point while requiring beginner-readable class/method Javadoc.Exact current source
0f4a836f012a6c695ead9e9d45911ff004edd918applies the smallest correction:ConfigServerApplication.javanow explains that it starts the standalone mightyETL Config Server, that repository selection remains #179/#189's deployment authority, inbound client authentication remains #193's separate security authority, and module existence does not make Config Server a required/default deployment service.main(String[])documents the Spring Boot argument contract. Annotations andSpringApplication.run(...)behavior are unchanged.Current hosted evidence
All exposed workflow aggregates associated with exact current source head are terminal-success:
31352330727;31352330693;31352330697;31352330707;31352330686.These green aggregates are compatibility/development evidence, not merge authorization. Current direct-
developpull-request workflows generally execute GitHub synthetic merge previews rather than accepted literal source; protected ETL JaCoCo can still analyze zero classes (#162/#164), repository-wide coverage scope is incomplete (#205), Maven vulnerability evidence can be incomplete despite a green aggregate (#196), and qualifying independent review is absent.Merge boundary
Keep Draft. Merge only when the unchanged exact source head has accepted literal-source deterministic/security evidence, complete same-revision dependency/vulnerability evidence, non-vacuous applicable owned-production coverage, every required repository/security gate, zero valid unresolved findings, and qualifying independent non-author formal approval where governance requires it. No predecessor-head, other-PR, incomplete-scanner, status-only, skipped-required, or synthetic-merge-only evidence transfers.