Skip to content

SUG-2795 T2 dedicated TCP IPVS path#4343

Open
zstack-robot-2 wants to merge 1 commit into
feature-5.5.28-lb-ipvsfrom
sync/dejing.liu/codex/sug-2795-mill-T2
Open

SUG-2795 T2 dedicated TCP IPVS path#4343
zstack-robot-2 wants to merge 1 commit into
feature-5.5.28-lb-ipvsfrom
sync/dejing.liu/codex/sug-2795-mill-T2

Conversation

@zstack-robot-2

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Complete T2 dedicated TCP IPVS backend/server group/scheduler/metric/delete coverage. Validated by TcpIpvsLoadBalancerListenerApiCase and live environment 172.24.241.166; Confluence 208924702 updated to version 119.

sync from gitlab !10304

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@MatheMatrix, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 35 minutes and 15 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: http://open.zstack.ai:20001/code-reviews/zstack-cloud.yaml (via .coderabbit.yaml)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 6bed28de-04df-4f46-9d48-60cbba98ee7c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 56564c1 and d9d03c8.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • plugin/loadBalancer/src/main/java/org/zstack/network/service/lb/LoadBalancerApiInterceptor.java
  • plugin/loadBalancer/src/main/java/org/zstack/network/service/lb/LoadBalancerBase.java
  • plugin/loadBalancer/src/main/java/org/zstack/network/service/lb/LoadBalancerFactory.java
  • plugin/virtualRouterProvider/src/main/java/org/zstack/network/service/virtualrouter/lb/SharedLoadBalancerFactory.java
  • plugin/virtualRouterProvider/src/main/java/org/zstack/network/service/virtualrouter/lb/VirtualRouterLoadBalancerBackend.java
  • test/src/test/groovy/org/zstack/test/integration/networkservice/provider/virtualrouter/loadbalancer/TcpIpvsLoadBalancerListenerApiCase.groovy
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch sync/dejing.liu/codex/sug-2795-mill-T2

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@MatheMatrix MatheMatrix force-pushed the sync/dejing.liu/codex/sug-2795-mill-T2 branch from 0dbfa1c to a2136af Compare June 26, 2026 10:06
Complete the SUG-2795 dedicated TCP IPVS T2 path. Allow
separate virtual router listeners to use server IP backends,
preserve server group metadata in refresh payloads, and fix
listener removal cleanup semantics.

Test: TcpIpvsLoadBalancerListenerApiCase and live 172.24.241.166
Resolves: ZSTAC-2795
Change-Id: I328135e3a1fb4dcfd7eb647a02151743c7157098
@MatheMatrix MatheMatrix force-pushed the sync/dejing.liu/codex/sug-2795-mill-T2 branch from a2136af to d9d03c8 Compare June 26, 2026 10:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant