Parallelism2

[timmens]

What we did:

• Differentiate between search radius factor and sample radius factor in speculative sampling

What happened:

• Benchmark results got slightly worse (especially for 4 and 8 cores)

What we want to do:

General idea: Make speculative sampling resemble sampling step after acceptance decision

• Tune search radius factor for parallel optimizer
• Use filter on existing points in speculative sampling

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.47%. Comparing base (1cacab1) to head (ee26d56).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on parallelism.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           parallelism      #10   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        78.46%   78.47%           
============================================
  Files               68       68           
  Lines             4928     4929    +1     
============================================
+ Hits              3867     3868    +1     
  Misses            1061     1061           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.