P0: make verification identity and portable execution reproducible#273
Merged
Conversation
pengfei-threemoonslab
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 14, 2026 21:35
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Trust boundary and intentional limitation
The v1 protocol defines one deterministic evaluate task. The worker validates exact transport inputs and runtime compatibility and emits decision-free IR; it does not offload the scan or policy engine. The verifier remains the sole policy engine, and assembly only re-closes that decision over a validated worker unit. This is a portable fail-closed execution boundary, not distributed policy evaluation, arbitrary sharding, parallel speedup, executor attestation, or a signature system.
The content-bound evaluation date is provenance, not authority to renew reviewer consent. Hard expiry is intentionally monotonic and may make a later reproduction stricter after a human grant expires. Historical receipts still bind the exact decision and artifacts assembled at the original evaluation.
Safety properties
Validation
Review focus
Please review the wall-clock floor on hard trust expiry, Git subject and worktree-overlay completeness, engine-distribution closure, worker and assembler authority separation, terminal receipt construction order, Action merge-SHA handling, cache normalization, legacy-reader behavior, and all new public schema/version migrations.
This PR must not be self-approved by a coding agent.