doc: fix vitepress sidebar (option 1 of 2)#38
Open
zdover23 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Order the pages in the sidebar so that they are (nearly) congruent with the schema agreed upon between Barbara and SAP. This is the first of two options I am creating on 13 Jul 2026. In this option, the Prysm page remains in the "Observability" folder. This is the location in which I found the Prysm page when I rearranged the other pages. It is reasonable to group the Prysm page under the rubric of "Observability", so in this commit I am leaving it where it is. The second option that I will create today will move the Prysm page between the Ceph page and the Chorus page in the "Cloud Storage" hierarchy. The second option is absolutely congruent with the schema agreed upon between Barbara and SAP. Either this commit (the first option) or the other commit (the second option) should be merged. The commit that is not merged should be rejected. Both options cannot be merged without creating a merge conflict. Signed-off-by: Zac Dover <zac.dover@clyso.com>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe VitePress sidebar now supports frontmatter-based ordering, and architecture pages receive explicit order values. A new cloud storage overview is added, several documentation blocks are corrected, and the Rook-Ceph installation guide is removed. ChangesDocumentation navigation and architecture
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/architecture/cloud-storage/overview.md (1)
41-65: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | 💤 Low valueConsider grouping components by layer in the data flow diagram.
The text at lines 14-18 describes three distinct layers (Foundation, Operations, Data Services), but the ASCII diagram places Rook, Arbiter, Chorus, and Liquid-Ceph as ungrouped siblings. Adding visual separation or labels in the diagram would improve clarity and align the diagram with the written architecture description.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/architecture/cloud-storage/overview.md` around lines 41 - 65, Update the architecture data-flow diagram to visually group components according to the documented Foundation, Operations, and Data Services layers. Add clear layer labels or separators around the relevant RADOS/OSD, Rook, Arbiter/Chorus/Liquid-Ceph, and interface components while preserving the existing flow and component relationships.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/architecture/cloud-storage/overview.md`:
- Around line 41-65: Update the architecture data-flow diagram to visually group
components according to the documented Foundation, Operations, and Data Services
layers. Add clear layer labels or separators around the relevant RADOS/OSD,
Rook, Arbiter/Chorus/Liquid-Ceph, and interface components while preserving the
existing flow and component relationships.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 477636d0-265b-4fe5-8560-9dbf6747200a
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
docs/.vitepress/config.mtsdocs/architecture/cloud-storage/arbiter.mddocs/architecture/cloud-storage/ceph.mddocs/architecture/cloud-storage/chorus.mddocs/architecture/cloud-storage/index.mddocs/architecture/cloud-storage/liquid-ceph.mddocs/architecture/cloud-storage/observability/index.mddocs/architecture/cloud-storage/overview.mddocs/architecture/cloud-storage/rook-ceph.mddocs/architecture/cloud-storage/rook.mddocs/architecture/cluster.mddocs/architecture/cortex.mddocs/architecture/hypervisor.mddocs/architecture/openstack.mddocs/architecture/rook-ceph-install.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- docs/architecture/rook-ceph-install.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Order the pages in the sidebar so that they are (nearly) congruent with the schema agreed upon between Barbara and SAP.
This is the first of two options I am creating on 13 Jul 2026. In this option, the Prysm page remains in the "Observability" folder. This is the location in which I found the Prysm page when I rearranged the other pages. It is reasonable to group the Prysm page under the rubric of "Observability", so in this commit I am leaving it where it is.
The second option that I will create today will move the Prysm page between the Ceph page and the Chorus page in the "Cloud Storage" hierarchy. The second option is absolutely congruent with the schema agreed upon between Barbara and SAP.
Either this commit (the first option) or the other commit (the second option) should be merged. The commit that is not merged should be rejected. Both options cannot be merged without creating a merge conflict.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation