Skip to content

feat(engine/ts + display/{http,socket,pipe}): CoreTS runtime engine + serve targets#33

Merged
Snider merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
lane/engine-ts
Jul 23, 2026
Merged

feat(engine/ts + display/{http,socket,pipe}): CoreTS runtime engine + serve targets#33
Snider merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
lane/engine-ts

Conversation

@Snider

@Snider Snider commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

go-render's TypeScript engine composing CoreTS (dappco.re/go/ts@v0.2.2) + the http/socket/pipe serve targets. All //go:build !js — the WASM binary (cmd/wasm) builds with the four new packages excluded. build+vet+real-Deno-test green. (Repo-wide wasm build ./... is red on pre-existing issues unrelated to this change — a clean HEAD shows identical errors.)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Co-Authored-By: Virgil virgil@lethean.io

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Snider, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 13 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 809bfeb9-39e4-4d32-81de-c1a429478beb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b9078c7 and e0de91b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
  • go/display/http/doc.go
  • go/display/http/http.go
  • go/display/http/http_example_test.go
  • go/display/http/http_test.go
  • go/display/pipe/doc.go
  • go/display/pipe/pipe.go
  • go/display/pipe/pipe_example_test.go
  • go/display/pipe/pipe_test.go
  • go/display/socket/doc.go
  • go/display/socket/socket.go
  • go/display/socket/socket_example_test.go
  • go/display/socket/socket_test.go
  • go/engine/ts/doc.go
  • go/engine/ts/engine.go
  • go/engine/ts/engine_example_test.go
  • go/engine/ts/engine_test.go
  • go/go.mod

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

… serve targets

go-render's TypeScript engine composing CoreTS (dappco.re/go/ts@v0.2.2) +
the http/socket/pipe serve targets. All //go:build !js — the WASM binary
(cmd/wasm) builds with the four new packages excluded. build+vet+real-Deno
green.

Co-Authored-By: Virgil <virgil@lethean.io>
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Snider
Snider merged commit 38eb393 into main Jul 23, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant