Skip to content

Checklist and verification needs type draft#612

Open
FScholPer wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
template_inspection_needs
Open

Checklist and verification needs type draft#612
FScholPer wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
template_inspection_needs

Conversation

@FScholPer

@FScholPer FScholPer commented Jun 23, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Relates to #611

📌 Description

Implements two new needs for verification report templates and checklists

🚨 Impact Analysis

  • This change does not violate any tool requirements and is covered by existing tool requirements
  • This change does not violate any design decisions
  • Otherwise I have created a ticket for new tool qualification

✅ Checklist

  • Added/updated documentation for new or changed features
  • Added/updated tests to cover the changes
  • Followed project coding standards and guidelines

Frank Scholter Peres frank.scholter_peres@mercedes-benz.com, Mercedes-Benz Tech Innovation GmbH
Provider Information

  • assisted by Github Copilot

@FScholPer
FScholPer requested a review from a-zw June 23, 2026 08:15
@FScholPer FScholPer linked an issue Jun 23, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
Add generic module verification and inspection needs to metamodel #611
Open
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 23, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //src:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output 
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.6.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: 56b4748e-f1c4-434f-b03e-1b56fcb29316
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: src
WARNING: Target pattern parsing failed.
ERROR: Skipping '//src:license-check': no such target '//src:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package 'src' defined by /home/runner/work/docs-as-code/docs-as-code/src/BUILD
ERROR: no such target '//src:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package 'src' defined by /home/runner/work/docs-as-code/docs-as-code/src/BUILD
INFO: Elapsed time: 6.116s
INFO: 0 processes.
ERROR: Build did NOT complete successfully
ERROR: Build failed. Not running target

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@FScholPer
FScholPer marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2026 09:11
AlexanderLanin
AlexanderLanin reviewed Jun 24, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/test_metamodel_load.py Outdated
Comment thread src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/options/test_options_verification_evidence.rst
MaximilianSoerenPollak
MaximilianSoerenPollak reviewed Jul 6, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread src/extensions/score_metamodel/metamodel.yaml
@FScholPer
FScholPer force-pushed the template_inspection_needs branch from 66a9c2d to 7464cbd Compare July 8, 2026 16:10
@FScholPer
Fix: Use RST block body instead of :content: option for comp_req
d3b9d6e 
The :content: option cannot be used directly in sphinx-needs directives as it's
a built-in core field. Instead, the requirement text should be provided as the
block body of the directive.

This fixes the 'Unknown option content' error in the file-based tests.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin left review comments
@MaximilianSoerenPollak MaximilianSoerenPollak MaximilianSoerenPollak left review comments
@a-zw a-zw Awaiting requested review from a-zw
@dcalavrezo-qorix dcalavrezo-qorix Awaiting requested review from dcalavrezo-qorix dcalavrezo-qorix is a code owner
@nradakovic nradakovic Awaiting requested review from nradakovic nradakovic is a code owner
@pahmann pahmann Awaiting requested review from pahmann
@PandaeDo PandaeDo Awaiting requested review from PandaeDo
@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech Awaiting requested review from aschemmel-tech
@masc2023 masc2023 Awaiting requested review from masc2023

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

INF - Infrastructure Community
Status: No status

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add generic module verification and inspection needs to metamodel

4 participants

@FScholPer @AlexanderLanin @MaximilianSoerenPollak @a-zw