Carry source revisions in proposition provenance - #73
Open
jimador wants to merge 28 commits into
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: James Dunnam <7660553+jimador@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Carry an optional opaque source revision through extraction, stored provenance, tenant-scoped queries, REST/discovery surfaces, collector fold/undo, and JSON without changing source locator identity.
Source revision is intentionally distinct from extraction-run lineage:
SourceRevisionRef(sourceKey, sourceRevision)identifies one logical source version, while run metadata continues to identify the analysis execution.Compatibility boundary
Behavior
SourceLocator.key()stable and stores revision as a scalar on existing source evidence.Review fixes
The issue was that a few edge paths could reuse the wrong source, partially mutate an undo, or leave compatibility and query-plan behavior asserted indirectly. The fix validates source identity before dedup reuse, resolves both undo participants before writing, proves persisted replay cardinality, pins an executable old-client binary fixture, and couples plan checks to the production query invocation.
Validation
./mvnw verify— all seven Dice modules passed (1,246 Dice tests and 110 storage tests)..envsucceeded; health is UP and James's read-only Discord handler returned HTTP 200 with an empty result using a future cursor.Refs #64. The remaining bundle integration gate waits on #46 and is not required for this PR's core source-revision behavior.