Skip to content

chore: remove OwlBot, ESLint, and Mocha files from core packages#8790

Open
suztomo wants to merge 2 commits into
googleapis:mainfrom
suztomo:remove-core-owlbot-files
Open

chore: remove OwlBot, ESLint, and Mocha files from core packages#8790
suztomo wants to merge 2 commits into
googleapis:mainfrom
suztomo:remove-core-owlbot-files

Conversation

@suztomo

@suztomo suztomo commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When these packages were maintained in separate split repositories, it made sense to manage the templated files through OwlBot/Synthtool (See examples: googleapis/nodejs-precise-date@a6c3da6 and googleapis/nodejs-common@3176404). It was convenient to generate pull requests across the split repositories based on one change in synthtool (example: googleapis/synthtool@b7858ba). Now we have the pacakges in one monorepo (and we have JetSki), we no longer need the synthtool template to make changes across the packages.

This PR removes:

  • .OwlBot.yaml and owlbot.py files from core packages.
  • Redundant package-level ESLint (.eslintrc.json, .eslintignore) and Mocha (.mocharc.js) configuration files in favor of repository-level configs.

For googleapis/librarian#5041.

@suztomo suztomo requested a review from a team as a code owner July 1, 2026 18:41

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request removes several synthtool configuration files and commit hash tracking files across multiple core directories, including core/common, core/paginator, core/precise-date, core/projectify, and core/promisify. There are no review comments, and I have no feedback to provide.

@suztomo suztomo changed the title chore: remove OwlBot files from core packages chore: remove OwlBot, ESLint, and Mocha files from core packages Jul 1, 2026
@suztomo suztomo requested a review from pearigee July 1, 2026 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants