Skip to content

docs: industry-agnostic positioning + 'Who is this for?' + comparison table - #44

Merged
intraq-dev-ai merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
readme-audience-comparison
Jul 29, 2026
Merged

docs: industry-agnostic positioning + 'Who is this for?' + comparison table#44
intraq-dev-ai merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
readme-audience-comparison

Conversation

@intraq-dev-ai

@intraq-dev-ai intraq-dev-ai commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

README improvements from the GitHub discoverability audit, aligned with our positioning:

  • The repo is general-purpose — any industry. 'Who is this for?' and 'Use cases' are framed by role and capability (operations teams, platform/SaaS vendors, internal BI) and use-case, with no vertical lock-in. Any SQL-backed database works.
  • Verticals are commercial-support only. A single soft line notes tailored, pre-built domain knowledge bases + support are available commercially at intraq.dev — without enumerating industries in the repo.
  • Comparison table — intraQ vs Power BI / Metabase / Lightdash, for 'X alternative' search intent.

Skipped: star/issue badges (low counts hurt) and developer technical articles (off-strategy). Community files, releases, Discussions, and topics were already in place.

@intraq-dev-ai intraq-dev-ai changed the title docs: add 'Who is this for?' section and comparison table docs: industry-agnostic positioning + 'Who is this for?' + comparison table Jul 29, 2026
@intraq-dev-ai
intraq-dev-ai merged commit 52ddc60 into main Jul 29, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant