add native DeepSeek support and robust binary deployment - #1
Draft
lee101 wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
|
Codex Infinity Start a task on this PR's branch by commenting:
Tasks and logs: https://codex-infinity.com |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
deepseek-v4-flashanddeepseek-v4-procodex-code-mode-hostWhy
DeepSeek's API uses Chat Completions rather than the Responses transport used by Codex's default provider. The local package also allowed the code-mode host to be absent, causing runtime failures after rebuilding only the main binary.
Impact
Users can export
DEEPSEEK_API_KEYand run either DeepSeek V4 model directly. Release builds now package and validate the code-mode companion host.Validation
cargo check -p codex-corecodex-cliandcodex-code-mode-hostdeepseek-v4-flashrequest returned the expected response