Skip to content

Add blocking rule for excessive PRs or issues #1087

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
aduh95 wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+2 −0
Open

Add blocking rule for excessive PRs or issues #1087

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions Moderation-Policy.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ of the [Code of Conduct][].
an exception to the reporting requirement described above.
* Accounts that are reasonably believed to be bots (other than bots authorized
by the TSC) are subject to immediate Blocking.
* Users who open PRs or issues faster than they can be reviewed or triaged
(e.g. >3 per day) are subject to immediate Blocking.

@bmuenzenmeyer bmuenzenmeyer Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd suggest we leave the consequence open to interpretation per the existing policy...especially when I compare this new clause to the two below it, which seem equally bad or perhaps even worse, but have less harsh penalties.

Suggested change
(e.g. >3 per day) are subject to immediate Blocking.
(e.g. >3 per day) are subject to immediate moderation.

* Issues, pull requests, discussions, and comments that are spam (job posting,
service advertising, etc.) are subject to immediate moderation.
* Issues, pull requests, discussions, and comments in violation of the [AI use
Expand Down
Loading