docs: add concrete type definition and update protocol references#2302
Open
BHUVANSH855 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs: add concrete type definition and update protocol references#2302BHUVANSH855 wants to merge 1 commit into
BHUVANSH855 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Any feedback ! |
Collaborator
|
@BHUVANSH855 Please don't tag people here. Both of them are notified by your PRs anyway and I'm sure they have seen them. If they think the PR is worth it they will give you feedback. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR introduces a formal definition for concrete types in the typing specification and updates protocol-related references to point to the new definition.
Changes
docs/spec/concepts.rst.int,str,list, or a user-defined class).docs/spec/protocol.rstto use the new:ref:\concrete-type`` reference.Related Issues
Closes #1781
Related to #1779