fix: correct false continuity example and disambiguate exercise labels - #617
fix: correct false continuity example and disambiguate exercise labels#617Chessing234 wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
1/x is not continuous at 0 on the closed interval; state the example as ¬ ContinuousOn and label both parts of Exercise 11.5.1. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
The second counterexample had no Verso doc comment; mark both as parts (a) and (b) of Exercise 11.6.4. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Split the transitive and antisymmetric majorization lemmas into parts (a) and (b). Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Give each set-algebra lemma in Exercises 3.1.7, 3.1.8, and 3.1.9 a unique (a)/(b)/… Verso anchor. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
|
Thanks — the Exercise 11.5.1 catch here was a real one, and I've landed it separately in #620 with credit to you. I'm closing this PR rather than merging it, because the rest of the changes are docstring disambiguation, and that premise doesn't hold for this repo. Repeated identical exercise docstrings are intentional house style — 12x If you'd like to propose changing the convention, please open an issue so it can be settled repo-wide. Statement corrections like the 11.5.1 one — false or mis-hypothesized |
|
Reopening — please disregard my previous comment, which was wrong. I assessed this against a stale checkout of Apologies for the noise. |
Summary
1/xis not continuous on[0,1]— state¬ ContinuousOnand label both parts.Test plan
lake build AnalysissucceedsMade with Cursor