release: 3.11.0#68
Merged
Merged
Conversation
486fc60 to
c9d1727
Compare
c9d1727 to
488d6bc
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
🧪 Testing To try out this version of the SDK: Expires at: Sat, 08 Aug 2026 22:19:13 GMT |
488d6bc to
363b52d
Compare
363b52d to
6644672
Compare
6644672 to
600834b
Compare
…(#157)
* ci(docs): generate docs on the PR, publish Postman from the raw spec
Move the mintlify-docs sync off the post-merge Stainless build and onto the
PR, right after the preview generation — restoring the pre-#136 "docs PR from
the PR" flow. The post-merge build was flaky: a downstream SDK target (usually
cli) failing, or Stainless's content cache skipping a re-run of the same
commit, silently blocked the docs sync.
- sync_docs now runs on pull_request (needs: preview) and creates/updates the
docs PR (branch api-spec-<pr>) from the PR's own code-sample-decorated spec.
No auto-merge — a human merges the docs PR once this PR lands, matching the
original flow.
- publish_postman builds the collection straight from specs/openapi.yml (the
converter ignores x-codeSamples), so it no longer depends on the Stainless
build, and publishes the live public collection only on merge to main (push
is path-filtered to specs/**).
- sdk_release keeps the Stainless build@main that cuts the per-language SDK
release PRs; it no longer gates docs or Postman, so a cli flake is just a
re-run.
Also reword the bulk-replace tenant_id param ("Update" -> "Replace") to
exercise the new PR-based docs generation.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(readme): document PR-time docs sync and raw-spec Postman flow
Rewrite the 'What happens in CI' section to match the restructured
workflow: docs sync now runs on the PR right after generation (no
auto-merge), and Postman/SDK-release run on merge — Postman built from
specs/openapi.yml, sdk_release no longer gating docs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* ci(e2e): pass COURIER_RESENDABLE_MESSAGE_ID through to the e2e run
The resend test reads COURIER_RESENDABLE_MESSAGE_ID (repo secret exists,
listed in node/.env.example) but it was never mapped into the e2e env
block, so env() fell back to "" and courier.messages.resend("") hit
POST /messages//resend -> 404. Wire the secret through.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
600834b to
78905db
Compare
78905db to
d076a39
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
🤖 Release is at https://github.com/trycourier/courier-cli/releases/tag/v3.11.0 🌻 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automated Release PR
3.11.0 (2026-07-09)
Full Changelog: v3.10.2...v3.11.0
Features
Bug Fixes
This pull request is managed by Stainless's GitHub App.
The semver version number is based on included commit messages. Alternatively, you can manually set the version number in the title of this pull request.
For a better experience, it is recommended to use either rebase-merge or squash-merge when merging this pull request.
🔗 Stainless website
📚 Read the docs
🙋 Reach out for help or questions