Add bound Samsung server certificate profile - #33
Open
Jason-Morcos wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This was referenced Aug 9, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context
This is the third authentication slice agreed in #28. The no-behavior-change
CertificateAuthrefactor (#31) and the isolatedPskAuthprovider (#32) are now merged and released as v0.1.4 and v0.1.5.I have several Samsung appliances operating locally in a private Home Assistant deployment. For the newer laundry certificate cohort, an already-authorized connection required all of these details together:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256;RSA+SHA256:ECDSA+SHA256:RSA+SHA1:ECDSA+SHA1, with session tickets disabled;What changes
SamsungServerProfile.bound_device(...).CertificateAuth.from_filesandfrom_memoryfactories.CertificateAuthcontext setup and verification callback unchanged.C=KRO=Samsung ElectronicsOU=OCF HA DeviceHow this relates to #16 and #20
Credential discovery, minting, authorization, provisioning, rotation, persistence, OTM, cloud/account access, and OCF security-resource writes remain intentionally out of scope.
Validation
4138905is signed and uses Jason's GitHub noreply address.Merge order
This PR has no dependency on unmerged work.